Skip to content

No AI slop. Real fares, real connections and 15+ years of algorithm development.

Enterprise

Lower travel cost across your whole meeting programme.

Sales kick-offs, trainings, leadership meetings: wherever you are free to choose the place, the place decides the cost. We find the best one from where your people start, with no new system and no change to your travel policy.

Glass office building glowing orange at golden hour against a soft sky

Same budget, more meetings

Lower cost per meeting, more meetings in person.

01 · Cost falls

−32%1

travel and hotel cost per meeting, at the location Convien found

Reference location

100

Convien location

68
32 freed

Index, reference location = 100

02 · Capacity rises

+47%2

more meetings from the same budget, because each one costs less

Reference location10 meetings

Same budget, Convien14.7 meetings

03 · Meetings convert

1.8Ă—3

more prospects become customers with an in-person meeting

of 100, without meeting
of 100, in-person meeting

The savings stay in the budget: 47% more in-person meetings, which convert 1.8Ă— better than none.

1) Client in the pharmaceutical industry, compared with the reference location named by the client. 2) Illustrative: constant budget and cost per meeting, 1 Ă· 0.68 = 1.47. 3) Oxford Economics survey of frequent business travellers (Nov 2012, n=300) for the U.S. Travel Association, 2013: 42 of 100 prospects converted with an in-person meeting, 23 of 100 without (42 Ă· 23 = 1.8); US data, industry-commissioned.

Your potential

What is the location worth to you?

Savings calculator

Shows your savings potential

Optimisable share (expected)

30%

€1,500,000

Potential savings per year

Or up to 47% more meetings from the same meeting budget.

Expected: a better location saves 30% of meeting-related travel spend, in line with our up to 35% lower travel cost. Your own data gives the exact figure. Capacity: at a client in the pharmaceutical industry, 32% lower travel and hotel cost per meeting paid for 47% more meetings with the same budget (1 Ă· 0.68).

Retrospective meeting analysis

Your own data, not an estimate. What each past meeting could have saved in travel cost, CO2 and travel time.

How good were your past location choices?

Start with your own meetings: proof from your real data before you roll out.

An individual case study of your past location choices, based on your real meetings and events. Each meeting is shifted into the future with the same duration, weekdays and season, so prices and connections stay realistic. We compare the actual location, your alternatives and the best locations our engine finds.

What you receive

  • A case study based on your real meetings
  • The actual location compared with alternatives, per meeting
  • CO2, travel cost and travel time, each shown as a difference
  • An assessment of how well past choices performed
  • An outlook on the value of the Meeting Place Finder going forward

How it works

  1. 1You select past meetings and events.
  2. 2You provide the base data per event: period, actual venue, attendee origins and, optionally, the alternatives you considered.
  3. 3We run the analysis with the Meeting Place Finder.
  4. 4You receive the case study and a joint review session.

A short call to agree scope and data format, then one data hand-over. We do the rest.

Request your retrospective analysis

CO2

Less CO2, not fewer meetings.

A better location shortens the trips of the whole group: up to 42% less CO2 for the same meeting, towards your SBTi targets and ready for ETS2.

  • Calculated, not estimated. atmosfair data according to the VDR standard, for every attendee and every mode.
  • Scope 3, category 6. CO2 per meeting, saved against your benchmark, ready for your report.
Dense green forest seen from above, with mist drifting over the treetops

Made for your programme

Fits into the way you already work.

  • Outlook add-in.

    The answer is there before the invitation goes out.

  • Your travel policy and rates.

    Every calculation uses them.

  • Reports for purchasing and sustainability.

    Travel cost and CO2 saved against your benchmark location, per meeting.

  • Origins, not people.

    City level only, nothing personal, easy for data protection.

Example
Report on saving potential: travel cost and CO2 per meeting, benchmark against chosen location
Example
Report on meeting location ranking: the top 10 locations by number of meetings

Benefits

One decision, many teams that gain.

  • Travel management

    One decision instead of forty bookings.

  • Procurement

    Negotiated rates work where meetings actually happen.

  • Finance

    A number on both sides of every decision.

  • Sustainability

    Lower CO2 without restricting meetings, towards your SBTi targets and ready for ETS2.

Integrations

Works where your teams already work.

Let’s look at your meetings.

Tell us about your meeting programme. We show you what a better location saves.